Page 22 of 26 FirstFirst ... 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 259

Thread: The Mueller Report has been sent to the Attorney General

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Harker Heights
    Posts
    25,209
    Post Thanks / Like
    If Barr testifies, about 5 seconds after he gives them what they are demanding, they will impeach him for breaking the law.
    We have met the enemy and he is us... POGO

  2. Likes Mestral liked this post
  3. #212
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UCLA / Unknown Corner of Lower Alabama
    Posts
    7,743
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by sojourner truth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If Barr testifies, about 5 seconds after he gives them what they are demanding, they will impeach him for breaking the law.
    From what I understand, a nearly fully un-redacted version of the report IS available to any member of Congress, and has been for weeks. This copy cannot be removed from the room it is in.
    I've heard that ALL the Democrats are REFUSING to go review it.


  4. Thanks sojourner truth thanked this post
    Likes Mestral liked this post
  5. #213
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    White Rock Estates
    Posts
    6,775
    Post Thanks / Like
    Like I wrote in post 208, the less redacted report is in a special place. It has been offered to all 12 members of the judiciary committee as well as Pelosi and Schumer. There is a report that Elizabeth Warren has read it, but other than that only Lindsey Graham and Doug Collins have read it.

    From Politico:
    "In addition to Collins, Graham and McConnell, Barr offered access to the report to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.
    Others granted access include the top Democrats on the House and Senate judiciary committees, Nadler and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, and the leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees: Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.). Burr told POLITICO on Tuesday morning he hadn’t seen the less-redacted report. And McCarthy said he had no intention of viewing it. “I trust what Barr put forward,” he said. “I’m satisfied right now with what I know.”



    "I hit the ball as hard as I can. If I can find it, I hit it again" John Daly

  6. #214
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Harker Heights
    Posts
    25,209
    Post Thanks / Like
    All but 6 lines in the report have been offered to congress for select members to review. I think one of the reasons they have refused is because they know that what they have seen in private will be leaked, and the leak will be attributed to those members only who have read the report. That would make what this is already even more transparent as the political game it is for democrats. And let there be no doubt, these ass clowns could care less about transparency and protecting the American people, or disclosing all of the fact to anyone. It is all about fighting the president and doing everything in their power to make sure he is not reelected. That is all they have going for them is the hate Trump line. They have no plans or agenda or anything else that they propose to improve America. They have 2 goals in life... Taxing the hell out of everyone so they can give it away to buy votes, and in the same light, to get reelected and maintain or gain power in DC.

    In a way, what is happening is sort of good because it becomes clear to many rail sitters that these guys are all about what they are against, and have no solid thing announced about what they are for. Other than getting rid of Trump. This is all they have going for them. They will get the votes of all progressives, Illegal aliens, and socialists but people who like their paychecks and the economy are going to vote for their prosperity and not on hate issues.

    Right now, the biggest game being played is for impeaching Barr, or at least casting so much of a "bias" shadow on him that when he starts uncovering the real rats in this case they can call foul and taint in his case.
    We have met the enemy and he is us... POGO

  7. Thanks shawnricheson thanked this post
  8. #215
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
    Posts
    20,511
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by fchafey View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Just like the minimally redacted Mueller report being in the SCF. Only a few have gone to look at it. Funny how the SCF prevents leakage....Go figure, some are probably even wonder why the report would be in a Skiff, as they didn't know congress had a boat....
    If congress had a boat, it would be named the USS Colander.
    I don't mind being called far right.
    I have been right so far.

  9. LOL fchafey, shawnricheson LOL'd at this post
  10. #216
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    1906 Twilight Drive Killeen Texas
    Posts
    2,002
    Post Thanks / Like

  11. #217
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Harker Heights
    Posts
    25,209
    Post Thanks / Like
    Barr will use the Holder defense.

    And all this is about, is making Barr look unbelievable prior to his exposing the lead up to the collusion thing.
    We have met the enemy and he is us... POGO

  12. Thanks Mestral thanked this post
  13. #218
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    2,334
    Post Thanks / Like
    I have been slogging through the report. Very eye opening. Very.

  14. #219
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Precinct 205, District 3, Killeen
    Posts
    15,688
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by txswimmer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I have been slogging through the report. Very eye opening. Very.
    Would you care to share some of your "eye-opening" insights? Is there material that is unknown because the MSM has ignored it? It would be a great service to us less enthused.



    Le mot catholique n’est pas un gros mot.

  15. #220
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    2,334
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ludwig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Would you care to share some of your "eye-opening" insights? Is there material that is unknown because the MSM has ignored it? It would be a great service to us less enthused.
    The actual Russian incursion was much more extensive than the press let on (both the conservative and liberal), probably because everyone was looking at Trump. Rather than the "amateur hour" portrayed by some, the GRU had a fairly wide network of operatives. The approaches to the Trump campaign were numerous and varied. The Trump campaign did a lot of talking with the Russians, and shared information. Mueller determined there was no criminal intent on the campaign's part, and, therefore, did not indict any of the campaign staff for those contacts.Mueller made it clear in his executive summaries (ignored by many) that "collusion" is an inartful (paraphrasing here) term - he was looking for a criminal conspiracy and found insufficient evidence.

Page 22 of 26 FirstFirst ... 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •