Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Oops! SIG P320 Again

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Precinct 205, District 3, Killeen
    Posts
    18,556
    Post Thanks / Like
    To date, not all units at Fort Hood have received new P320. The soldiers I have talked with are not very enthused about getting them either.
    "A boy cannot become a girl and a man cannot become a woman, not even if he shuts his eyes and wishes really hard."



  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hymesa Estates, Killeen
    Posts
    32,773
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ludwig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    To date, not all units at Fort Hood have received new P320. The soldiers I have talked with are not very enthused about getting them either.
    i kind of doubt if that many soldiers are ever issued one......mac

  3. Thanks CenTexDave thanked this post
  4. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UCLA / Unknown Corner of Lower Alabama
    Posts
    10,456
    Post Thanks / Like
    I wonder if the XM1152 ball round cartridges are a bit light on powder, causing some failures.
    At my LGS that has an indoor range, they sell reloads, and one box a friend was shooting had many failures, due to being a bit light on the powder.


  5. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,607
    Post Thanks / Like
    I want to take a look at the glock19X. Has anyone seen one locally yet?

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    192
    Post Thanks / Like
    PX had one a week ago.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
    Posts
    22,233
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by kantwin View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I wonder if the XM1152 ball round cartridges are a bit light on powder, causing some failures.
    At my LGS that has an indoor range, they sell reloads, and one box a friend was shooting had many failures, due to being a bit light on the powder.
    If you find specs (bullet weight and velocity) on the XM1152 and XM1153, let me know.
    I haven't seen them published yet.
    I don't mind being called far right.
    I have been right so far.

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,633
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mestral View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If you find specs (bullet weight and velocity) on the XM1152 and XM1153, let me know.
    I haven't seen them published yet.
    What I've found so far:
    XM-1152 = 115 gr. FMC / XM-1153 = 147 JHP
    Source:
    https://www.glocktalk.com/threads/wi....1684267/print



  9. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
    Posts
    22,233
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by D-agobert II View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What I've found so far: Source: ...
    I appreciate the effort, but without the velocity I can't predict failure rates or modes.

    I can tell you that the WWB ammo will not be a hot load, and on the 115 grain load, failure to feed would be the expected failure, especially if someone "limp wrists" the weapon. I have also seen pictures of the Hollow Point version of the XM ammo, and it appears to be a substantially different design than the common Hollow Points in use today.
    I don't mind being called far right.
    I have been right so far.

  10. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,633
    Post Thanks / Like
    Does it look like this?

    If so I've read some speculation that they're the standard WWB 147gr hollow point topped with a teflon coated penetrator to facilitate penetration of body armor somewhat like the scary Eagle Talon "cop killer" bullets that got the libs so worked up about a few years ago. Wait until they find out about these though they might be dumb enough to believe that anything in common issue to the military will never come into civilian hands if only they can get Saints Feinstein or Schumer to scribble a law. We all know no cops have been killed since they saved the world from "cop killer" projectiles with their scribbles.

  11. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
    Posts
    22,233
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23
    I haven't seen anything about Teflon coating, but I have seen FMJ-Flat Nosed
    bullets (actually, TMJ or metal cased) for "barrier penetration" similar to
    the FBI barrier penetration standards: plywood, windshield, etc.

    The HP rounds appear to be a copper alloy throughout, rather than jacketed,
    and have very deep serrations, similar to the "RIP" rounds that got laughable
    promotions a couple years back.
    I don't mind being called far right.
    I have been right so far.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •